Skip to main content
Book a Free Call

Bookkeeping Basics

Keeper Bookkeeping Software: What It Does

Understand Keeper bookkeeping software, its close and client-workflow features, ledger integrations, controls, limits, and evaluation steps.

  • Reviewed
  • Reading time5 min
  • FormatDefinition

Keeper bookkeeping usually refers to the accounting practice-management and month-end-close software historically known as Keeper. The current product is branded Double. It connects with accounting ledgers and helps teams organize tasks, client questions, document requests, transaction review, reporting, and close workflows. It is not a replacement for the general ledger, source records, a competent bookkeeper, or management approval.

The name can also refer to unrelated bookkeeping providers. Confirm the exact company, domain, product, contract, and legal provider before connecting accounting data or sending documents.

Where Keeper fits in the accounting system

A ledger such as QuickBooks Online, Xero, Sage, or NetSuite records accounting transactions and balances. Close-management software sits around that ledger. It can coordinate the people and evidence needed to finish the books, surface possible errors, collect answers, and track whether required review steps are complete.

Layer Primary role Key control
Source systems Bank, card, payroll, sales, bills, and operations Complete population and cutoff
Ledger Double-entry transactions and account balances Balanced, supported posting
Keeper or Double Close tasks, questions, review, and communication Workflow ownership and approval
Reporting Financial statements, schedules, and analysis Agreement with final ledger

Common workflow features

  • Recurring close tasks with owners, due dates, dependencies, and status
  • Client questions connected to transactions or requested documents
  • Review tools that flag coding, balance, or period exceptions for investigation
  • Secure client communication and reminder workflows
  • Management reports, close dashboards, and issue tracking
  • Connections that exchange approved information with supported ledgers

Feature availability, supported products, pricing, and naming can change. Review the current product documentation and signed agreement instead of relying on an old Keeper comparison page.

A controlled monthly workflow

  1. Define the entity, accounting basis, close date, expected accounts, and required reports.
  2. Confirm that statements, payroll, processors, invoices, bills, and source documents arrived.
  3. Complete ledger posting and resolve duplicate, missing, uncategorized, or out-of-period activity.
  4. Send focused client questions that identify the transaction, evidence needed, and deadline.
  5. Reconcile cash, cards, processors, payroll, taxes, receivables, payables, debt, and other material balances.
  6. Review proposed corrections, estimates, manual entries, and changes to closed periods.
  7. Issue reports, preserve the close package, lock the period, and carry unresolved items forward.

What automation can and cannot prove

A rule or model can flag an unusual vendor, missing class, duplicated amount, unexpected balance, or large variance. The flag is a question, not proof of the correct accounting. Someone must examine the contract, invoice, statement, business purpose, period, tax treatment, and surrounding transactions.

Likewise, a completed task does not prove the account reconciles. Require the official statement or independent schedule, book balance, reconciling items, preparer, reviewer, date, and evidence. Financial statements should agree with the accepted ledger after all corrections.

Access and data security

Use individual accounts, multifactor authentication, least privilege, and delegated ledger connections. Do not share the primary administrator password or verification codes. Review which users can view client data, change transactions, connect apps, export reports, or approve work.

Ask how information is encrypted, retained, backed up, deleted, and returned. Identify subprocessors, incident notification, recovery procedures, activity logs, and offboarding. Remove access promptly when staff or providers leave, but preserve required records and a complete transition package first.

Evaluate the product before adoption

Document the number of entities, ledgers, users, monthly tasks, client contacts, integrations, review steps, reports, and security requirements. Test one representative close. Confirm that the connection does not create duplicates, that corrections synchronize as intended, and that reports still tie to the ledger.

Calculate total cost using subscriptions, implementation, data migration, training, custom setup, integrations, staff time, and exit work. Compare the product with a controlled checklist, the ledger’s native tools, another close platform, and a simpler workflow. More automation is valuable only when it reduces repeatable work without weakening review.

Continuity and evidence

Keep the accounting subscription, primary administrator, bank authority, recovery contacts, and document archive under business control. Periodically export the trial balance, general ledger, statements, reconciliations, task history, unresolved questions, user list, and key configuration. Test whether another authorized person can complete the next close.

If Keeper or Double is replaced, reconcile the last synchronized period and verify that tasks, attachments, client answers, adjustment support, and report definitions are retained. A workflow platform should make the close more reproducible, not make the accounting inaccessible.

Measure whether the workflow improves the close

Establish a baseline before implementation. Useful measures include days to close, accounts reconciled by deadline, missing documents, unanswered client questions, old exceptions, duplicate or uncategorized transactions, post-close changes, review rework, and staff hours. Define each measure so a faster close cannot be achieved merely by excluding difficult accounts or leaving questions unresolved.

Review adoption and quality by entity and preparer. Repeated late tasks may indicate unrealistic deadlines, unclear ownership, missing integrations, weak training, or a client process problem. Repeated review notes should lead to a rule, procedure, mapping, or upstream correction when possible.

Schedule a 30-day and 90-day configuration review after implementation. Remove unused fields and duplicate tasks, tighten permissions, confirm notifications reach the right people, and retest every ledger connection. Preserve the original goals and approved configuration so later automation can be evaluated against business outcomes.

Compare the broader bookkeeping-program selection guide, build a reliable small-business bookkeeping workflow, and review the best bookkeeping app criteria.

Frequently asked questions

Is Keeper still the product name?

The product historically known as Keeper is currently branded Double. Verify current naming, features, and terms on the official site.

Does Keeper replace QuickBooks or Xero?

No. It can integrate with supported ledgers and coordinate close work, but the ledger remains the accounting system of record.

Can Keeper automatically reconcile accounts?

Software can assist with matching and exceptions, but a valid reconciliation still needs complete source evidence, explained differences, and review.

Is Keeper a bookkeeping service?

The keyword can refer to software or unrelated service providers. Confirm the exact legal provider and written scope before purchasing.

What should I test before connecting a ledger?

Test permissions, data scope, synchronization, duplicate prevention, corrections, reports, exports, activity logs, and disconnection procedures.

Who owns the accounting decisions?

Management retains responsibility for records, policies, approvals, estimates, access, filings, and acceptance of the final books.

Turn this guide into action

Want a clearer, more dependable financial process?

Talk through your bookkeeping needs